不同耕作施肥方式对稻茬小麦氮素利用及土壤容重的影响

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 【目的】探明不同耕作施肥方式对稻茬小麦氮素利用、产量及土壤容重的影响。【方法】以“川麦104”为材料,研究了“免耕-表施肥-稻草盖种（T1）”、“免耕-浅施肥-浅旋盖种（T2）”、“深翻-深施肥-浅旋盖种（T3）” 3 种耕作施肥方式对小麦干物质量、氮素积累转运量、土壤容重、硝态氮含量的影响。【结果】与T1、T2相比,T3处理成熟期植株干物质积累量分别提高17.5%和7.3%,植株氮积累量分别提高22.3%和11.5%,小麦开花后营养器官向籽粒的氮转运量分别提高17.5%和11.9%,小麦籽粒产量分别提高26.2%和10.4%,氮肥表观利用率分别提升8.4和6.9个百分点,氮肥偏生产力、农学效率及生理利用率均明显提高;T3处理下,亚表层土壤容重显著降低,总孔隙度明显提高,硝态氮供应能力明显增强。【结论】在试验条件下,综合考虑氮素利用、产量和土壤条件,“深翻-深施肥-浅旋盖种”模式为最佳耕作施肥方式,可供生产中参考。

关键词: 稻茬麦, 耕作施肥方式, 氮素利用, 土壤容重

Abstract: 【Objective】 The objectives of current study were to explore the effect of different tillage and fertilization methods on nitrogen utilization, wheat yield and Soil bulk density in the rice-wheat rotation system. 【Method】 ‘Chuan Mai 104’ being chosen as experimental material, we investigated the effects of three different tillage and fertilization treatment on wheat biomass, nitrogen accumulation and transportation, soil bulk density and nitrate nitrogen content. The three treatments include ‘no-tillage+surface application no fertilization+straw-covered seed’ (T1), ‘no-tillage+upper application no fertilization+shallow-rotary-tillage-covered seed’ (T2) and ‘deep-plowed +deep application no fertilization+shallow rotation covered’ (T3). 【Result】 Compared with T1 and T2 treatments, T3 treatment has increased the dry matter accumulation by 17.5% and 7.3% respectively, the nitrogen accumulation of plant by 22.3% and 11.5% respectively, the nitrogen transport from vegetative organs to grain by 17.5% and 11.9% respectively after anthesis, the grain yield of wheat by 10.4% and 26.2%, and the apparent nitrogen use efficiency by 8.4% and 6.9%respectively. In addition, the partial factor productivity from applied N,agronomical effect and physiological utilization ratio have accelerated significantly under T3 treatment as compared to T1 and T2. Whilst the bulk density has decreased significantly under T3 treatment, conversely to total porosity and nitrate supplying capacity of subsurface soil which were significantly enhanced by T3 trea-tment, as compared to T1 and T2 treatments. 【Conclusion】 Based on a comprehensive consideration of nitrogen use efficiency, grain yield and soil condition, we recommend that the deep-plowed+deep application no fertilization+shallow rotation covered should be the best tillage and fertilization method for high yield and beneficial production of wheat in Chengdu plain.

Key words: rice stubble wheat, tillage and fertilization, nitrogen utilization, soil bulk density

中图分类号:

S158.3

王科, 李浩, 邓劲松, 张成, 钟文挺, 孙加威, 任哓波. 不同耕作施肥方式对稻茬小麦氮素利用及土壤容重的影响[J]. 四川农业大学学报, 2020, 38(06): 654-660.

WANG Ke, LI Hao, DENG Jinsong, ZHANG Cheng, ZHONG Wenting, SUN Jiawei, REN Xiaobo. Effects of Different Tillage and Fertilization Methods on Nitrogen Utilization and Soil Bulk Density in Rice-Wheat Rotation System[J]. Journal of Sichuan Agricultural University, 2020, 38(06): 654-660.

参考文献 33

[1]	蒋云, 张洁, 郑建敏, 等. 四川省近10 年小麦区试产量性状分析[J]. 四川农业大学学报, 2019, 37(4): 589-595.
[2]	王科, 李浩, 张成, 等. 成都市粮食生产现状分析[J]. 四川农业科技, 2018(3): 5-6.
[3]	李倩, 李晓秀, 吴会军, 等. 不同气候和施肥条件下保护性耕作对农田土壤碳氮储量的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2018,24(6): 1539-1549.
[4]	张建军, 樊廷录, 赵刚, 等. 耕作方式与长期定位施肥对雨养农田冬小麦产量的调控效应[J]. 草业学报, 2018, 27(7):175-186.
[5]	武云霞, 刘芳艳, 孙永健, 等. 水氮互作对直播稻产量及稻米品质的影响[J]. 四川农业大学学报, 2019, 37(5): 604-610.
[6]	PENG Z P, MA S Y, WANG Y Q, et al.Plant and soil fertility characteristics of different winter wheat fields in the Huang-huai-hai plain of China[J]. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B-soil and Plant Science, 2016, 66(7): 1-10.
[7]	翟振, 李玉义, 张莉, 等. 短期深旋松对黄淮海沙姜黑土耕层结构及小麦生长的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(4):1211-1218.
[8]	翟振, 李玉义, 逄焕成, 等. 黄淮海北部农田犁底层现状及其特征[J]. 中国农业科学, 2016, 49(12): 2322-2332.
[9]	刘战东, 刘祖贵, 宁东峰, 等. 深松耕作对玉米水分利用和产量的影响[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2015, 34(5): 6-12.
[10]	吴萍萍, 李录久, 耿言安, 等.耕作与施肥措施对江淮地区白土理化性质及水稻产量的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2018, 32(6): 243-248.
[11]	周宝元, 孙雪芳, 丁在松, 等.土壤耕作和施肥方式对夏玉米干物质积累与产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2017, 50(11): 2129-2140.
[12]	裴雪霞, 党建友, 张定一, 等. 不同降水年型下旱地深翻时间和施肥方式对小麦产量及水肥利用率的影响[J]. 麦类作物学报2018, 38(3): 330-339.
[13]	WU M, LI G, LI W, et al.Nitrogen fertilizer deep placement for increased grain yield and nitrogen recovery efficiency in rice grown in subtropical China[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2017, 8: 1227.
[14]	乔云发, 苗淑杰, 陆欣春. 不同耕作模式对东北风沙土区玉米产量及氮素利用率的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2019, 33(5):205-210.
[15]	鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 3版. 北京: 中国农业出版社,2000.
[16]	陈丽, 张璐, 鑫吴枫, 等. 河北平原麦玉两熟轮耕模式对土壤特性及作物产量的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2019 (5): 143-150.
[17]	刘苹, 李燕, 赵海军, 等. 施肥方式对小麦生长、产量及土壤硝态氮含量的影响[J]. 河南农业科学, 2017, 46(3): 66-70.
[18]	孔凡磊, 袁继超, 张海林, 等. 耕作方式对华北两熟区冬小麦生长发育和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2013, 39(9): 1612-1618.
[19]	江晓东, 迟淑筠, 李增嘉, 等. 少免耕模式对冬小麦花后旗叶衰老和产量的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2008, 24(4): 55-58.
[20]	王祥菊, 周炜, 王子臣, 等. 土壤耕作与秸秆还田对小麦产量及麦季温室气体排放的影响[J]. 扬州大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2016, 37(3): 101-106.
[21]	贺建华, 王平, 陈娟, 等. 不同轮耕方式对旱作区土壤容重、水分及春玉米产量的影响[J]. 土壤通报, 2018, 49(2): 415-422.
[22]	王玥凯, 郭自春, 张中彬, 等. 不同耕作方式对砂姜黑土物理性质和玉米生长的影响[J]. 土壤学报, 2019, 56(6): 1370-1380.
[23]	梁海, 陈宝成, 韩惠芳, 等. 深松35 cm可改善潮棕壤理化性质并提高小麦和玉米产量[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2019,25(11): 1879-1886.
[24]	张瑞富, 杨恒山, 高聚林, 等. 深松对春玉米根系形态特征和生理特性的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2015, 31(5): 78-84.
[25]	王永华, 刘焕, 辛明华, 等. 耕作方式与灌水次数对砂姜黑土冬小麦水分利用及籽粒产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(5): 801-812.
[26]	FENG X, HAO Y, LATIFMANESH H, et al.Effects of subsoiling tillage on soil properties, maize root distribution, and grain yield on mollisols of Northeastern China[J]. Agronomy Journal, 2018,110(4): 1607-1615.
[27]	陈慧, 黄振江, 王冀川, 等. 水氮耦合对滴灌冬小麦氮素吸收、转运及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2018, 50(1): 44-56.
[28]	郑成岩, 于振文, 王东, 等耕作方式对冬小麦氮素积累与转运及土壤硝态氮含量的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2012,18(6): 1303-1311.
[29]	黄明, 吴金芝, 李友军, 等. 耕作方式和秸秆覆盖对旱地麦豆轮作下小麦籽粒产量、蛋白质含量和土壤硝态氮残留的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2018, 27(9): 34-44.
[30]	陈松鹤, 徐开未, 樊高琼, 等. 长期施氮对饲草玉米产量、土壤养分和微生物数量的影响[J]. 四川农业大学学报, 2019,37(3): 314-320.
[31]	聂胜委, 黄绍敏, 张水清, 等. 施肥方式对不同基因型小麦年际间产量及其构成的影响[J]. 河南农业科学, 2014(2): 51-57.
[32]	金欣欣, 姚艳荣, 贾秀领, 等. 基因型和环境对小麦产量、品质和氮素效率的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(4): 635-644.
[33]	梅旭荣, 黄桂荣, 严昌荣, 等. 水分亏缺冬小麦近等基因系冠气温差与群体总耗水量的关系[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(1):244-253.