四川农业大学学报 ›› 2007, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (01): 76-81.doi: 10.16036/j.issn.1000-2650.2007.01.016

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同密度巨桉林草复合模式初期土壤特征研究

武卫国1, 胡庭兴1, 周朝彬1, 李进峰1, 曾晓东2   

  1. 1. 四川农业大学 林学园艺学院, 四川 雅安 625014;
    2. 乐山市林业局, 四川 乐山 614000
  • 收稿日期:2006-11-15 出版日期:2007-03-31 发布日期:2017-03-03
  • 基金资助:
    国家"十五"科技攻关项目"四川盆周低山丘陵区水土流失综合治理技术与示范"(项目编号:2004BA606A-06);四川省教育厅应用基础项目"区域人工林基础生态学过程及调控研究"(项目编号:2005A011)。

Studies on Soil Characteristics of Different Stand Densities of Eucalyptus grandis+grass Compound Patterns at Initial Stage

WU Wei-guo1, HU Ting-xing1, ZHOU Chao-bin1, LI Jin-feng1, ZENG Xiao-dong2   

  1. 1. College of Forestry and Horticulture, Sichuan Agricultural University, Yaan 625014, Sichuan, China;
    2. Leshan Forestry Bureau, Leshan 614000, Sichuan, China
  • Received:2006-11-15 Online:2007-03-31 Published:2017-03-03

摘要: 在株距为1.5 m,行距分别为3、4、5、6、8 m,相应初植密度为2222、1667、1333、1111、833株/hm25种不同密度的巨桉林中,设置3种巨桉林草复合种植模式:巨桉+鸭茅(简称模式Ⅰ)、巨桉+高羊茅(模式Ⅱ)、巨桉+牛鞭草(模式Ⅲ)。对该复合模式土壤特征进行了定位研究。初期结果显示:土壤物理性质(容重、非毛管孔隙度与总孔隙度)均有一定程度的改善;土壤有机质变化3种模式大体一致,表现为5月 > 11月 > 8月,水解氮动态变化则表现为8月 > 5月 > 11月,而有效P与速效K均表现为5月 > 8月 > 11月;方差分析表明,3种模式间土壤各速效养分变化差异均达到显著水平(P<0.05),但由于处于林草复合模式初期,不同密度间变化差异尚不太明显。综合土壤养分动态变化与已有相关研究结果,初步认为模式Ⅲ(巨桉+牛鞭草模式)为该地比较适宜的种植模式。

关键词: 巨桉, 林草复合种植模式, 土壤特征, 养分动态, 林分密度

Abstract: The experiment was conducted in three Eucalyptus grandis+grass compound planting patterns which have five different densities.Three patterns were E. grandis+Dactylis glomerata L.(p attern Ⅰ), E. grandis+Festuca arundinacea Schreb.(pattern Ⅱ), E. grandis+Hemarthria compressa (L.f) R.BY.(pattern Ⅲ).Soil characteristics of the compound planting patterns were studied.The primary results show ed as follows:The soil physical properties (bulk density, non-capillary porosity and the total porosity) were improved to a certain degree.The account of soil organic matter had comparable trends among the three patterns and the order of the account of soil organic matter was May > November > August.The order of hydrolysis nitrogen was Augus > May >November.The orders of available P and Kwere May > August > November.The difference of the soil available nutrients among the three compound planting patterns was significant (P<0.05).The forest densities did not show obvious effect, for the research was carried out at the initial stage of E. grandis+grass compound pattern.Integrating with the soil nutrient dynamics and the related research, the model Ⅲ[E. grandis+Hemarthria compressa (L.f) R.BY.]is more appropriate for the district.

Key words: Eucalyptus grandis, forest-grass compound planting pattern, soil characteristics, nutrient dynamics, stand density

中图分类号: 

  • S714.8