四川盆地西缘不同功能型树种凋落叶功能性状特征

doi:10.16036/j.issn.1000-2650.2020.03.002

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 【目的】为了解华西雨屏区亚热带不同植物功能型树种凋落叶功能性状特征,探讨不同植物功能型树种对环境的适应策略。【方法】以四川盆地西缘都江堰灵岩山亚热带森林群落为研究对象,采集了18种树种凋落叶,分为常绿阔叶、落叶阔叶和针叶3个植物功能型,比较分析碳（C）、氮（N）、磷（P）、木质素和纤维素及其化学计量比在不同功能型树种间的变异。【结果】常绿阔叶和落叶阔叶树种凋落叶N含量显著低于针叶树种,C ∶ N比显著高于针叶树种;常绿阔叶树种凋落叶P含量显著低于落叶阔叶和针叶树种;不同功能型树种间凋落叶C含量、C ∶ P和N ∶ P比无显著差异;落叶阔叶树种木质素含量显著低于常绿阔叶和针叶树种,常绿阔叶和落叶阔叶树种凋落叶纤维素：N比显著高于针叶树种;而纤维素含量和木质素： N比在不同功能型树种间无显著差异。【结论】四川盆地西缘不同植物功能型树种之间凋落叶功能性状差异显著,这可能影响区域森林群落养分循环机制。

关键词: 亚热带森林群落, 凋落叶, 化学计量特征, 木质素, 纤维素, 植物功能型

Abstract: 【Objective】 The aim of this study was to investigate the leaf litter traits of different functional types in subtropical regions of rainy area of west China, and to explore their adaptation strategy to environmental conditions. 【Method】 This study was carried out in a subtropical forest community of Lingyan Mountain in Dujiangyan on the western edge of the Sichuan Basin. Leaf litters of 18 tree species were collected. The investigated trees were divided into three types： evergreen broad-leaved, deciduous broad-leaved and coniferous plant, according to the plant functional types. The differences of carbon (C), nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), lignin and cellulose content and their stoichiometric ratios among different functional types were compared and analyzed. 【Result】 Litter of evergreen broad-leaved and deci-duous broad-leaved species exhibited lower N content and higher C ∶ N ratio than those of conifers. Litter of evergreen broad-leaved species relative to deciduous broad-leaved and coniferous species had significantly lower P content. There was no significant difference in litter C content, C ∶ P and N ∶ P ratios among three types of trees. Deciduous broad-leaved trees showed lower litter lignin content compared with evergreen broad-leaved and coniferous trees. Litter cellulose： N ratio of evergreen broad-leaved and deciduous broad-leaved trees was significantly higher than that of conifers, while the cellulose content and lignin： N ratio were not significantly different among the three plant functional types. 【Conclusion】 The litter functional characteristics were significantly different among the plant functional types on the western edge of the Sichuan Basin, which might influence the diverse nutrient cycling mechanism of forest communities in the region.

Key words: subtropical forest community, leaf litter, stoichiometric characteristics, lignin, cellulose, plant functional type

中图分类号:

S718.5

黄川雄, 刘思凝, 邓纪坤, 龚贵荣, 吴昌焱, 熊仕臣, 徐振锋. 四川盆地西缘不同功能型树种凋落叶功能性状特征[J]. 四川农业大学学报, 2020, 38(03): 257-263.

HUANG Chuanxiong, LIU Sining, DENG Jikun, GONG Guirong, WU Changyan, XIONG Shichen, XU Zhenfeng. Leaf Litter Traits of Different Functional Tree Types on the Western Edge of the Sichuan Basin[J]. Journal of Sichuan Agricultural University, 2020, 38(03): 257-263.

参考文献

[1] 郭志文, 赵文霞, 罗久富, 等. 大岗山亚热带常绿阔叶林16种木本植物功能性状的变异特征[J]. 福建师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 35(1): 82-87.
[2] PÉREZ-HARGUINDEGUY N, DÍAZ S, GARNIER E, etal. New handbook for standardised measurement of plant functional traits worldwide[J]. Australian Journal of Botany, 2013, 61(3): 167-234.
[3] WESTOBY M, FALSTER D S, MOLRS A T.Plant ecological strategies: Some leading dimensions of variation between species[J]. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 2002, 33(33): 125-159.
[4] ZHU S D, SONG J J, LI R H.Plant hydraulics and photosynthesis of 34 woody species from different successional stages of subtropical forests[J]. Plant Cell Environ, 2013, 36(4): 879-891.
[5] GARNIER E, CORTEZ J, BILLES G.Plant functional markers capture ecosystem properties during secondary succession[J].Ecology, 2004, 85(9): 2630-2637.
[6] 王凤友. 森林凋落量研究综述[J]. 生态学进展, 1989, 6(2): 82-89.
[7] 吴承祯, 洪伟姜, 姜志林, 等. 我国森林凋落物研究进展[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2000, 2(3): 405-410.
[8] GUO L B, SIMS R E H. Litter production and nutrient return in New Zealand eucalypt short rotation forests: implications for land management[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 1999, 7(1): 93-100.
[9] 唐仕姗, 杨万勤, 殷睿, 等. 中国森林生态系统凋落叶分解速率的分布特征及其控制因子[J]. 植物生态学报, 2014, 38(6): 529-539.
[10] 葛晓改, 曾立雄, 肖文发, 等. 三峡库区森林凋落叶化学计量学性状变化及与分解速率的关系[J]. 生态学报, 2015, 35(3): 779-787.
[11] 郭培培, 江洪, 余树全, 等. 亚热带6种针叶和阔叶树种凋落叶分解比较[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2009, 15(5): 655-659.
[12] 阎恩荣, 王希华, 郭明, 等. 浙江天童常绿阔叶林、常绿针叶林与落叶阔叶林的C ∶ N ∶ P化学计量特征[J]. 植物生态学报,2010, 34(1): 48-57.
[13] 唐仕姗, 杨万勤, 王海鹏, 等.中国森林凋落叶氮、磷化学计量特征及控制因素[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2015, 21(2):316-322.
[14] 王文君, 杨万勤, 谭波, 等. 四川盆地亚热带常绿阔叶林土壤动物对几种典型凋落物分解的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2013,22(9): 1488-1495.
[15] ROWLAND A P, ROBERTS J D.Lignin and cellulose fractionation in decomposition studies using acid-detergent fibremethods[J]. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 1994, 3(25): 269-277.
[16] 宋永昌. 植被生态学[M]. 上海: 华东师范大学出版社, 2001: 673.
[17] 贺金生, 韩兴国. 生态化学计量学: 探索从个体到生态系统的统一化理论[J]. 植物生态学报, 2010, 34(1): 2-6.
[18] 任书杰, 于贵瑞, 姜春明, 等. 中国东部南北样带森林生态系统102个优势种叶片碳氮磷化学计量学统计特征[J]. 应用生态学报, 2012, 23(3): 581-586.
[19] ÅGREN G I.Stoichiometry and nutrition of plant growth in natural communities[J]. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics, 2008(39): 153-170.
[20] Yuan Z Y, Chen H Y.Global trends in senesced-leaf nitrogen and phosphorus[J]. Global Ecology & Biogeography, 2010, 18(5): 532-542.
[21] 舒利贤, 皮发剑, 喻理飞, 等. 黔中喀斯特地区典型次生林内凋落叶化学计量特征[J]. 河南科技大学学报:自然科学版,2017, 38(5): 60-64.
[22] 窦荣鹏, 江洪, 余树全, 等. 4种亚热带树木凋落叶的分解研究[J]. 浙江林学院学报, 2010, 27(2): 163-169.
[23] 李德军, 莫江明, 方运霆, 等. 氮沉降对森林植物的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2003, 23(9): 1891-1900.
[24] 曾昭霞, 王克林, 刘孝利, 等. 桂西北喀斯特区原生林与次生林鲜叶和凋落叶化学计量特征[J]. 生态学报, 2016, 36(7):1907-1914.
[25] SARDANS J, PENUELAS J.Tree growth changes with climate and forest type are associated with relativeallocation of nutrients, especially phosphorus to leaves and wood[J]. Global Ecology & Biogeography, 2013, 22(4): 494-507.
[26] TREMBLAY F.On the issue of inter-correlation in proprioceptive ability across body areas: a comment on Han[J]. Perceptual Motor Skills, 2013, 117(2): 597-600.
[27] 王晶苑, 王绍强, 李纫兰, 等. 中国四种森林类型主要优势植物的C ∶ N ∶ P化学计量学特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2011, 35(6): 587-595.
[28] 蒋龙, 徐振锋, 吴福忠, 等. 亚热带3种典型常绿森林土壤和植物叶片碳氮磷化学计量特征[J]. 应用与环境生物学报,2019, 25(4): 759-767.
[29] CHAPIN F S Ⅲ, KEDROWSKI R A. Seasonal changes in nitrogen and phosphorous fractions and autumn retranslocation in evergreen and deciduous Taiga tree[J]. Ecology, 1983, 64(2):376-391.
[30] BOERNER R E J. Foliar nutrient dynamics and nutrient use efficiency of four deciduous tree species in relation to site fertility[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 1984, 21(3): 1029-1040.
[31] 黄建军, 王希华. 浙江天童山32种常绿阔叶树叶片的营养及结构特征[J]. 华东师范大学学报, 2003, 1(3): 92-97.
[32] 王绍强, 于贵瑞. 生态系统碳氮磷元素的生态化学计量学特征[J]. 生态学报, 2008, 28(8): 3937-3947.
[33] AERTS R.Nutrient resorption from senescing leaves of perennials: Are there general patterns?[J]. Journal of Ecology, 1996, 84(4): 597-608.
[34] AERTS R, CHAPIN F S Ⅲ. The mineral nutrition of wild plants revisited: a re-evaluation of processes and patterns[J]. ElsevierScience & Technology, 1999, 30(30): 1-67.
[35] MCGRODDY M E, DAUFRESNE T, HEDIN L O, et al.Scaling of C ∶ N ∶ P stoichiometry in forests worldwide: implications of terrestrial Redfield-type ratios[J]. Ecology, 2004, 85(9): 2390-2401.
[36] GÜhsewell S.N ∶ P ratios in terrestrial plants: variation and functional significance[J]. New Phytologist, 2004, 164(2): 243-266.
[37] 曾德慧, 陈广生. 生态化学计量学: 复杂生命系统奥秘的探索[J]. 植物生态学报, 2005, 29(6): 1007-1019.
[38] 宾振钧, 王静静, 张文鹏, 等. 氮肥添加对青藏高原高寒草甸6个群落优势种生态化学计量学特征的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2014, 38(3): 231-237.
[39] TAYLOR B R, PARKINSON D, PARSONS P W F J, et al. Nitrogen and lignin content as predictors of litter decay rates: a microcosm test[J]. Ecology, 1989, 70(1): 97-104.
[40] 马志良, 高顺, 杨万勤, 等. 亚热带常绿阔叶林凋落叶分解过程中氮和磷在不同雨热季节的释放动态[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2015, 21(2): 308-315.
[41] 邓仁菊, 杨万勤, 冯瑞芳, 等. 季节性冻融期间亚高山森林凋落物的质量变化[J]. 生态学报, 2010, 30(3): 830-835.