贫困农户的风险分担网络及其有效性研究——基于中国农村家庭数据的实证

doi:10.16036/j.issn.1000-2650.2019.04.019

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 【目的】利用中国家庭金融调查（CHFS）2013年和2015年的农户数据,实证考察贫困农户的风险分担网络及其效果。【方法】把农户分担网络归纳为家庭、村庄、市场和社会层面4个纬度,建立风险分担模型和影响机制模型,检验贫困农户不同维度风险应对机制的实际效果和可能的作用路径。【结果】①贫困与非贫困农户的风险分担网络存在系统性差异;②贫困农户无法依赖自身力量、村庄社会网络和市场机制分担风险,社会救助是其应对风险冲击的最后一道屏障。非贫困农户能够利用多个纬度的风险应对机制,具有更强的抗风险能力。③贫困农户缺乏社会资本投资能力是其非正规风险分担能力不足的重要原因。【结论】构建农村“社会安全网”对贫困农户意义重大,应作为精准扶贫和精准脱贫战略的重要抓手。

关键词: 贫困, 农户, 风险分担网络, 影响机制

Abstract: 【Objective】 Based on China Household Finance Survey data in 2013 and 2015, this paper aim to empirically explore the risk sharing network of the poor farmer and its effect. 【Method】 Risk Shar-ing Network of the poor family is divided into four levels including household-level, village-level, market-level and society-level. We constructed risk sharing model and influence mechanism model to test actual impact of different risk coping mechanisms and explored the influence channel. 【Result】①There was systematic difference between the risk sharing networks of poor farmers and non-poor farmers;②The poor farmers cannot depend on the strength of their own family、village social network or market mechanism to cope with risk. The social assistance system is the last protective strength for the poor. Non-poor farmers can utilize multiple mechanisms to deal with risk and thus, have more anti-risk capability;③One of the reasons that the ability of informal risk sharing for the poor is not sufficient is because they lack the ability of social capital investment. 【Conclusion】 Building society safety network is of great significance for the poor and poverty alleviation.

Key words: poverty, farmer, risk sharing network, influence mechanism

中图分类号:

F325.14

王阳, 漆雁斌. 贫困农户的风险分担网络及其有效性研究——基于中国农村家庭数据的实证[J]. 四川农业大学学报, 2019, 37(04): 566-578.

WANG Yang, QI Yanbin. Research on the Risk Sharing Network of the Poor Farmer and Its Effectiveness ——An Empirical Study Based on Chinese Rural Household Data[J]. Journal of Sichuan Agricultural University, 2019, 37(04): 566-578.

参考文献

[1] 张栋浩, 尹志超. 金融普惠、风险应对与农村家庭贫困脆弱性[J]. 中国农村经济, 2018(4): 54-73.
[2] MORDUCH J .Poverty and vulnerability[J]. American Economic Review, 1994, 84(2): 221-225.
[3] DEATON A.Household saving in LDCs: credit markets, insurance and welfare[J]. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 1992, 94(2): 253-273.
[4] 马小勇. 中国农户的风险规避行为分析: 以陕西为例[J]. 中国软科学, 2006 (2): 22-30.
[5] MORDUCH J.Income smoothing and consumption smoothing[J]. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1995, 9(3): 103-114.
[6] DERCON S.Growth and shocks: evidence from rural Ethiopia[J]. Journal of Development Economics, 2004, 74(2): 309-329.
[7] YILMA Z, MEBRATIE A, SPARROW R, et al.Coping with sh-ocks in rural Ethiopia[J]. Journal of Development Studies, 2014, 50(7): 1009-1024.
[8] THAI T Q, FALARIS E M.Child schooling, child health, and rainfall shocks: evidence from rural vietnam[J]. Journal of Devel-opment Studies, 2014, 50(7): 1025-1037.
[9] JALAN J, RAVALLION M.Are the poor less well insured Evidence on vulnerability to income risk in rural China[J]. Journal of Development Economics, 1999, 58(1): 61-81.
[10] 陆铭, 张爽, 佐藤宏. 市场化进程中社会资本还能够充当保险机制吗? 中国农村家庭灾后消费的经验研究[J]. 世界经济文汇, 2010(1): 16-38.
[11] CLARKE D, DERCON S.Insurance, credit and safety nets for the poor in a world of risk[J]. Working Papers, 2009: 1-16.
[12] DERCON S.Income risk, coping strategies, and safety nets[J]. The World Bank Research Observer, 2002, 17(2): 141-166.
[13] DERCON S, CHRISTIAENSEN L.Consumption risk, technology adoption and poverty traps: evidence from Ethiopia[J]. Journal of Development Economics, 2010, 96(2): 159-173.
[14] ROSENZWEIG M R, WOLPIN K I.Credit market constraints, consumption smoothing, and the accumulation of durable produc-tion assets in low-income countries: investments in bullocks in India[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1993, 101(2): 223-244.
[15] JALAN J, RAVALLION M.Behavioral responses to risk in rural China[J]. Journal of Development Economics, 2001, 66(1): 23-49.
[16] HELTBERG, R, HOSSAIN, N, REVA, A, et al.Coping and resilience during the food, fuel, and financial crises[J]. Journal of Development Studies, 2013, 49(5): 705-718.
[17] 蒋远胜, 肖诗顺, 宋青锋. 家庭风险分担机制对农村医疗保险需求的影响: 对四川省的初步调查报告[J]. 人口与经济, 2003(1): 74-80.
[18] 马小勇, 白永秀. 中国农户的收入风险应对机制与消费波动: 来自陕西的经验证据[J]. 经济学, 2009, 8(4): 1221-1238.
[19] 陈玉宇, 行伟波. 消费平滑、风险分担与完全保险: 基于城镇家庭收支调查的实证研究[J]. 经济学, 2007, 6(1): 253-272.
[20] 陈传波. 中国小农户的风险及风险管理研究[M]. 北京: 中国财政经济出版社, 2005: 12-35.
[21] 陈传波. 中国农户的非正规风险分担实证研究[J]. 农业经济问题, 2007(6): 20-26.
[22] 徐伟, 章元, 万广华. 社会网络与贫困脆弱性: 基于中国农村数据的实证分析[J]. 学海, 2011(4): 122-128.
[23] 邰秀军, 黎洁, 李树茁. 贫困农户消费平滑研究评述[J]. 经济学动态, 2008(10): 106-110.
[24] 邰秀军, 李树茁, 李聪, 等. 中国农户谨慎性消费策略的形成机制[J]. 管理世界, 2009(7): 85-92.
[25] UDRY C.Risk and insurance in a rural credit market: An empirical investigation in northern Nigeria[J]. The Review of Economic Studies, 1994, 61(3): 495-526.
[26] TOWNSEND R M.Risk and insurance in village India[J]. Econ-ometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 1994: 539-591.
[27] FAFCHAMPS M, LUND S.Risk-sharing networks in rural Phi-lippines[J]. Journal of Development Economics, 2003, 71(2): 261-287.
[28] 王阳, 漆雁斌. 农户风险规避行为对农业生产经营决策影响的实证分析[J]. 四川农业大学学报, 2010, 28(3): 376-382.
[29] 张爽, 陆铭, 章元. 社会资本的作用随市场化进程减弱还是加强?: 来自中国农村贫困的实证研究[J]. 经济学, 2007, 6(2): 539-560.
[30] 徐伟, 章元, 万广华. 社会网络与贫困脆弱性: 基于中国农村数据的实证分析[J]. 学海, 2011(4): 122-128.
[31] 王晓全, 骆帝涛, 王奇. 非正式保险制度与农户风险分担建模与政策含义: 来自CFPS数据的实证研究[J]. 经济科学, 2016(6): 89-101.
[32] MUNSHI K D, ROSENZWEIG M R.Why is Mobility in India so Low? Social insurance, inequality, and growth[J]. Nber Working Papers, 2009: 1-30.
[33] 甘犁, 尹志超, 贾男, 等. 中国家庭资产状况及住房需求分析[J]. 金融研究, 2013(4): 1-14.
[34] 徐丽鹤, 袁燕. 财富分层、社会资本与农户民间借贷的可得性[J]. 金融研究, 2017(2): 131-146.
[35] RAY D.Development economics[M]. Princeton, New Jersey:Pr- inceton University Press, 1998.
[36] 陈强. 高级计量经济学及Stata 应用[M]. 2版. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2014: 116-133.