石漠化治理区主栽经果林地土壤肥力诊断与评价

doi:10.16036/j.issn.1000-2650.2018.05.013

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 【目的】探明贵州石漠化治理区刺梨与核桃经果林地土壤肥力的丰缺现状,可以为当地石漠化治理区合理林地经营和科学施肥提供参考依据。【方法】利用改进后的内梅罗综合指数法,对石漠化治理区主栽品种刺梨和核桃两类林地的土壤肥力进行研究。选取土壤的pH值、有机质、全氮、全磷、全钾、碱解氮、速效磷、速效钾8个指标,对土壤养分进行分析,并参照全国第二次土壤普查分级标准对土壤肥力进行综合评价与因子分析。【结果】石漠化治理区两类林地土壤综合肥力系数变幅为1.36~1.49之间,总体上土壤肥力属一般水平,以土壤全氮、有机质和速效磷为两类林地土壤肥力组成的重要影响因子,而土壤全钾和速效钾为两类林地土壤的限制性因子。【结论】两类林地的土壤肥力保持较为一般,仍有进一步优化上升的空间。钾素的缺乏可能成为贵州石漠化治理区刺梨和核桃两类林地土壤质量提高的限制性因子,应有针对性地补充含钾素的有机肥料。

关键词: 石漠化, 土壤肥力, 诊断, 评价

Abstract: 【Objective】 The objective of this study was to explore the status of soil fertility of economic fruit forests dominated by Rosaroxbunghii and Juglans regia in the Guizhou desertification control area and to provide a reference for scientific fertilization of rational forest management in the local desertification control area. 【Method】 Soil fertility of economic fruit forests mainly planted with Rosaroxbunghii and Juglans regia in the rocky desertification control area was evaluated using improved Nemerow index method. Eight factors were analyzed in this study,such as soil pH,organic matter, total nitrogen,total phosphorus, total potassium, available nitrogen,available phosphorus and available potassium and soil nutrients. Comprehensive evaluation and factorial analysis of soil fertility was conducted according to national second soil census nutrient classification standards. 【Result】 The integrated fertility index of the two forests in the rocky desertification control area varied from 1.36 to 1.49 and soil fertility was generally at middle level. Soil total nitrogen, organic matter and available phosphorus were important factors of soil fertility in Rosaroxbunghii and Juglans regia forests but soil potassium and available potassium were limited factors for Rosaroxbunghii and Juglans regia forests. 【Conclusion】 Soil fertility of two forest types remained relatively moderate. More efforts should be needed to improve soil fertility of this area. The lack of potassium may be a factor limiting soil quality in both forests of rocky desertification control area of Guizhou Province. Organic fertilizer with contain potassium should be added purposely.

Key words: rocky desertification, soil fertility, diagnosis, evaluation

中图分类号:

S158.2

肖杰, 刘子琦, 李开萍, 文雅琴, 陈海. 石漠化治理区主栽经果林地土壤肥力诊断与评价[J]. 四川农业大学学报, 2018, 36(05): 658-664.

XIAO Jie, LIU Ziqi, LI Kaiping, WEN Yaqin, CHEN Hai. Diagnosis and Evaluation of Soil Fertility in Economic Fruit Forests of Rocky Desertification Control Area[J]. Journal of Sichuan Agricultural University, 2018, 36(05): 658-664.

参考文献 30

[1]	熊康宁, 朱大运, 彭韬, 等. 喀斯特高原石漠化综合治理生态产业技术与示范研究[J]. 生态学报, 2016, 36(22): 7109-7113.
[2]	郭柯, 刘长成, 董鸣. 我国西南喀斯特植物生态适应性与石漠化治理[J]. 植物生态学报, 2011, 35(10): 991-999.
[3]	曹建华, 袁道先, 童立强. 中国西南岩溶生态系统特征与石漠化综合治理对策[J]. 草业科学, 2008, 25(9): 40-50.
[4]	邱虎森, 苏以荣, 黎蕾, 等. 典型喀斯特高原坡地土壤养分分布及其影响因素[J]. 土壤, 2013, 45(6): 985-991.
[5]	SHENG M Y, XIONG K N,WANG L J,et al.Response of soil physical and chemical properties to Rocky desertification succession in South China Karst[J]. Carbonates and Evaporites,2018, 33(1): 15-28.
[6]	颜萍, 熊康宁, 檀迪, 等. 喀斯特石漠化治理不同水土保持模式的生态效应研究[J].贵州师范大学学报(自然科学版),2016, 34(1): 1-7, 21.
[7]	崔高仰, 容丽, 李晓东, 等. 喀斯特高原峡谷石漠化治理过程中土壤理化性质的变化[J]. 生态学杂志, 2017, 36(5): 1188-1197.
[8]	阙文杰, 吴启堂. 一个定量综合评价土壤肥力的方法初探[J]. 土壤通报, 1994, 25(6): 245-247.
[9]	王昭, 石建省, 张兆吉, 等. 关于饮用地下水水质评价标准的探讨: 以华北平原地下水水质调查结果为例[J]. 地球学报,2009, 30(5): 659-664.
[10]	庞世龙, 欧芷阳, 申文辉, 等. 广西喀斯特地区不同植被恢复模式土壤质量综合评价[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2016, 36(7): 60-66.
[11]	钟杰, 蒋新革, 吴立潮, 等. 石漠化演替过程中土壤肥力质量综合评价[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2013, 33(7): 56-61.
[12]	孙泉忠. 贵州省石漠化综合治理人工种草土壤肥力综合评价[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2015, 43(9): 94-97.
[13]	王建锋. 重庆石漠化丘陵区耕层土壤养分空间变异性研究及肥力综合评价[D]. 重庆, 西南大学, 2010.
[14]	舒英格, 何腾兵, 高雪, 等. 喀斯特山区县域耕地土壤养分综合评价[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2009, 37(8): 112-115.
[15]	鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 3版. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2013: 30-106.
[16]	杨皓, 胡继伟, 黄先飞, 等. 喀斯特地区金刺梨种植基地土壤肥力研究[J]. 水土保持研究, 2015, 22(3): 50-55.
[17]	全国土壤普查办公室. 中国土壤[M]. 北京: 中国农业科技出版社, 1998: 111.
[18]	任明强, 张家德, 卢正艳, 等. 贵州省喀斯特与非喀斯特农业生态地质环境质量对比研究. 中国岩溶, 2009, 28(4): 397-401.
[19]	SOFíA B, KEN T, MARK R. The effect of soil pH on persistence of seeds of grassland species in soil[J]. Plant Ecology, 2015, 216(8): 1163-1175.
[20]	刘世全, 高丽丽, 蒲玉琳, 等. 西藏土壤有机质和氮素状况及其影响因素分析[J].水土保持学报, 2004, 18(6): 54-57, 67.
[21]	LOPEZ-HERNANDEZ I D, BURNHAM C P The effect of pH on phosphate adsorption in soils[J]. European Journal of Soil Science, 2010, 25(2): 207-216.
[22]	丛日环, 李小坤, 鲁剑巍. 土壤钾素转化的影响因素及其研究进展[J]. 华中农业大学学报, 2007, 26(6): 907-913.
[23]	武天云, JEFF J, 李凤民, 等.土壤有机质概念和分组技术研究进展[J]. 应用生态学报, 2004, 15(4): 717-722.
[24]	肖杰, 熊康宁, 顾再柯, 等. 喀斯特石漠化治理区土壤养分综合评价与对比: 以贵州朝营和顶坛小流域为例[J]. 水土保持研究, 2018, 25(2): 293-299.
[25]	伍光和, 王乃昂,胡双熙, 等. 自然地理学(第四版)[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2008: 329-331.
[26]	覃家科, 殷兴华, 吕仕洪, 等. 喀斯特生态重建果园土壤养分季节变化研究[J]. 水土保持研究, 2010, 17(6): 101-105.
[27]	KUZYAKOV Y.Sources of CO2 efflux from soil and review of partitioning methods[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2006. 38(3): 425-448.
[28]	LI W, LI D J, YANG L Q, et al.Rapid recuperation of soil nitrogen following agricultural abandonment in a karst area,southwest China[J]. Biogeochemistry, 2016, 129(3): 341-354.
[29]	汪明冲, 张新长, 李辉霞, 等. 喀斯特石漠化生态恢复过程中土壤质量变化分析: 以古周生态恢复重建区为例[J]. 生态环境学报, 2016, 25(6): 947-955.
[30]	高丽丽, 刘世全, 张世熔. 西藏土壤钾素状况及其影响因素分析[J]. 四川农业大学学报, 2004, 22(2): 165-169, 178.