Email Aleft | RSS

四川农业大学学报 ›› 2004, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (02): 133-137.doi: 10.16036/j.issn.1000-2650.2004.02.010

• • 上一篇    下一篇

葡萄品种遗传关系的RAMP分析

吕秀兰, 张光伦, 廖明安, 龚荣高, 曾秀丽   

  1. 四川农业大学 林学园艺学院, 四川 雅安 625014
  • 收稿日期:2004-03-16 出版日期:2004-06-30 发布日期:2017-03-04
  • 基金资助:
    四川省科技厅"十五"育种攻关项目;四川省教育厅重点项目

Random Amplified Microsatellite Polymorphism(RAMP) Analysis of Grape Breeds Genetic Relationships

LÜ Xiu-lan, ZHANG Guang-lun, LIAO Ming-an, GONG Rong-gao, ZENG Xiu-li   

  1. College of Forestry and Horticulture, Sichuan Agricultural University, Yaan 625014, Sichuan, China
  • Received:2004-03-16 Online:2004-06-30 Published:2017-03-04

PDF (PC)

34

赞

摘要： 对目前南方大力推广的18个葡萄品种进行了RAMP分析。结果表明,品种间遗传差异明显,多态性高。33个引物组合产生的148条DNA扩增片段中,120条具有多态性,占81.1%,每个引物组合可扩增1~8条多态性带,平均4.5条。遗传相似系数变化范围0.759~0.945,平均值为0.844。聚类分析显示,RAMP标记能将18个品种完全分开,鉴定出引入栽培的京秀和信浓笑两个品种遗传关系很近。同时,RAMP标记的聚类结果与葡萄品种抗感霜霉病类型基本一致。

关键词: 葡萄, RAMP分析, 品种鉴定, 葡萄霜霉病

Abstract: The RAMP analysis of the popular 18 grape breeds indicates that diversity genetic is present 33 primer combinations produce 148 bands, among which 120(81.1%) are polymorphic. 1~8 polymorphic bands can be amplified from each primer combination, with an average being 4.5 bands. The genetic similarity coefficients range from 0.759 to 0.945, with the mean being 0.844. Cluster analysis shows that RAMP markers can distinguish the 18 breeds and identify the introduced Jing xiu and Shingno Smile resemblance of genetic relationships. Meanwhile, the cluster results of RAMP markers are almost identical with the anti-plasmopara uiticola types of grape breeds.

Key words: grape, RAMP analysis, greed identification, Plasmopara uiticola

中图分类号: 

  • S323
ISSN 1000-2650
CN 51-1281/S
主办：四川农业大学
主编：吴　德
地址：四川雅安市雨城区，四川农业大学学报编辑室
邮编：625014
电话：0835-2882295
Email：jsau@sicau.edu.cn

版权所有 © 2018 《四川农业大学学报》编辑部